Summary of 1999 Funded State Improvement Grant Applications
August 1999
MICHIGAN

Abstract or Conceptual Framework for State Systemic Change

A set of four Hubs for coordinating training and information flow will be established to:

The model will implement a function-based approach that will enable training and development of effective practices to proceed in a coordinated and systematic manner regardless of topical issue. The functional model will integrate diverse and existing state-level activities into a cohesive, coordinated and efficient effort. The technical assistance provided by the project is aimed at building local district capacity to improve student performance by ensuring linkages between sustained learning efforts, local school improvement plans and student performance data. The target audience for project activities will be general and special educators and parents. 

MICHIGAN Basic Information

 Project Title:

Investing In Our Students

Michigan’s Model to Improve the Performance of Students with Disabilities. A proposal for systemic improvement in personnel development based on Michigan’s Plan to Improve the Performance of Students with Disabilities

 Primary contact person:

Karen Rockhold

 Address:

Michigan Department of Special education and Early Intervention Services
P. O. Box 30008
Lansing, MI

 Phone:

517-373-9433

 Fax:

517-373-7504

 Email:

krockhol@oses.mde.state.mi.us

 Web site:

http://www.mde.state.mi.us/off/sped/

 Date SIG application written/submitted:

October 1, 1998

 Round funded:

First

 Begin/end dates for funding:

1999-2003

 Funded amount /year:

$1,320,000

 Who wrote the application?

Contractor

 Length of application:

 Narrative: 119 pages

 Appendices: 3

 How long are they? Approximately 25 pages

 

 MICHIGAN Improvement Strategies

 

1. What specific products are planned for development? 

2. What interstate connections are planned? 

No direct references were made to interstate connections, however specific activities that relate to state credentialing and coordinated personnel development may lead to connections beyond the state boundaries.

3. What strategies are planned for service delivery?

Hub III will have primary responsibility for personnel development. A coordinated team of personnel development specialist will guide the efforts with local and regional support for skill development and application. Hub III activities will focus on enhancing the ability of parents and educators to use strategies such as positive behavior supports to design interventions

Some of the proposed activities that support service delivery strategies include:

4. What partnership strategies are intended?

The model proposes to use a Partnership Team and a Management Team to coordinate the overall interactive operation of the SIG. The Partnership team will review data on progress, identify targeted priorities and set topics based on identified criteria. The Management Team will coordinate interactions among the Hubs and implement the established topic.

Partnerships are also an integral part of each Hub's activities. The four hubs will be funded to Intermediate School Districts. The Hubs will be responsible for establishing partnerships with various entities to complete their designated work.

5. Who are the partners?

A wide range of partners will be involved in the SIG. They include members designated by state Special Education Advisory Committee (SEAC) which has broad based membership (thirty one entities) representing special education, general education, associations, etc. They include:

6. What types of contracts or subgrants are intended to partners, LEAs, IHE, PTIs, and others (including lead agency under Part C)?

Each Hub will contract with various IHEs, IHE personnel, parent groups and projects, other professionals, professional organizations, and others to assist with Hub activities. 

7. How will resources be pooled with other resources?

The project proposes to pool resources from existing projects funded using Part B discretionary funds, Part C funds, Grants to intermediate and local education agencies, and Department of Education resources such as Goals 2000, etc. to support the objectives and activities that will be carried out in each Hub. Examples include:

 SIG Summary Main Page